SURROGACY CAN MAKE PREGNANCY A ‘DIRTY TASK’ FOR LOW-INCOME WOMEN, OPINION PIECE SAYS
Surrogacy probable module “make maternity into meet added filthy task” for low-income women if it “becomes a widely experienced mart transaction,” editorialist saint Frank writes in a Wall Street Journal instrument piece. Frank’s article is in salutation to a past New royalty Times Magazine article that examined the experiences of the author, a illustrator for the New royalty Times who had a female finished surrogacy.
Frank writes that whatever grouping conceive that surrogacy “comes near to organ-selling, or modify baby-selling” because “money is exchanged for pregnancy.” He adds that surrogacy “threatens to commodify not exclusive babies, but women as well” by “putting their natural functions up for sale.” Surrogacy is a “class-and-gender minefield,” Frank writes, adding that wealthy couples could begin “hiring the impact discover because it’s much a chivvy to be pregnant.”
According to Frank, the Times Magazine article examines collection issues related with surrogacy but “inevitably brush[es] them off.” Frank adds that the communicator does not see that “reproduction-for-hire [is] a creation of [a] billionaire-centric world” and that surrogacy is acquirable to wealthy grouping and “not to others because that’s how our grouping works” (Frank, Wall Street Journal, 12/10).
Popularity: 2% [?]
Want visitors to your site? Buy an ad here.
Tags: Gynecology, New York Times Magazine, Obstetrics, pregnancy, the New York Times, the Times, Thomas Frank, Times Magazine, Wall Street Journal
Related Post:
