LAWMAKERS MUST ACT TO END GENDER BIAS IN INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MARKET, EDITORIAL SAYS

Women as a assemble are “particularly disadvantaged” in the individualist upbeat shelter market, a St. siege Times article says. The article notes that a past think conducted by the National Women’s Law Center institute that women “pay a love toll for their gender, with premiums significantly higher than men’s for the aforementioned coverage.” For example, 40-year-old women crapper grappling monthly premiums that are 4% to 48% higher than their phallic counterparts for the aforementioned coverage, the article says. Premiums also “varied wildly” within states, it adds.

Because women with employer-based upbeat shelter are fortified from sexuality favouritism by federal and land antidiscrimination laws, “gender-based payment variations exclusive effect women who essay to acquire shelter in the individualist mart — a assemble that tends to allow women who impact at baritone stipendiary jobs,” according to the editorial. Although “[i]nsurance actuaries vindicate this continual sexuality notch in upbeat shelter pricing by claiming that women ingest the upbeat tending grouping more,” the “statistics seem to verify a assorted story,” the article states. It continues, “If the payment variations between men and women were genuinely supported solely on differences in the ingest of upbeat care, you would wait toll uniformity. Because there isn’t, the variations declare partiality has seeped into the system.”

The article adds, “President-elect Barack Obama has committed to attain comprehensive changes to the upbeat shelter system, but until that happens, Florida lawmakers crapper at small protect women from existence aerated unfairly.” It concludes, “The affordability of upbeat shelter should not be a concern of one’s gender, no concern what the noodle counters say” (St. siege Times, 12/2).

Popularity: 3% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

WP Text Ads Want visitors to your site? Buy an ad here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Post:

  • BIRTH OF OCTUPLETS RAISES CONCERNS ABOUT FERTILITY ETHICS, EDITORIAL SAYS
  • BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S EFFORTS TO ENACT HHS CONSCIENCE REGULATION COMES AS ‘NO SURPRISE,’ EDITORIAL SAYS
  • HHS PROVIDER ‘CONSCIENCE’ RULE VIOLATES PATIENTS’ RIGHTS, EDITORIAL SAYS
  • DIAMOND ENGAGEMENT RINGS – SHOULD THEY BE APPRAISED AND INSURED?
  • HOW TO MAKE SURE YOUR DIAMONDS ARE INSURED PROPERLY
  • WHY YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR DIAMONDS PROPERLY INSURED
  • WHAT YOU MUST KNOW WHEN INHERITING JEWELRY
  • SOME OF THE REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD ALWAYS INSURE YOUR DIAMONDS
  • EDITORIAL, OPINION PIECE RESPOND TO RESIGNATION OF DYBUL AS PEPFAR ADMINISTRATOR
  • RHINOPLASTY COSTS NEED TO BE UNDERSTOOD TO MAKE A WISE DECISION
  • Leave a Reply